Bible refinements (Check 12.3.1 dual-assert + R33 9th cascade surface)…
Decision
Bible refinements (Check 12.3.1 dual-assert + R33 9th cascade surface) shipped as ONE combined PR #19 rather than two separate PRs or direct-commit.
Rationale
Decision-matrix scoring (weighted 1-5): one-combined-PR = review_friction 5×0.25 + partial_revert 3×0.167 + bundled_context 5×0.25 + cascade_followup 4×0.167 + commit_hygiene 4×0.167 = 4.34; two-separate-PRs = 3×0.25 + 5×0.167 + 3×0.25 + 3×0.167 + 4×0.167 = 3.42; direct-commit-to-main = 5×0.25 + 1×0.167 + 4×0.25 + 5×0.167 + 2×0.167 = 3.59. Combined-PR wins on review-friction (AJ reads one PR top-to-bottom with shared context from same Fivetran reference pilot) + bundled-context-value (Check 12.3.1 learning and R33 learning share common root cause — same upgrade retrospective, same commit reference 4e17419). Partial-revert remains tractable via git revert --no-commit <sha> on individual hunks if needed. Direct-commit-to-main was rejected despite highest review-friction score because Bible changes affect every pair fleet-wide — PR review is appropriate gating even when single-reviewer. Session reasoning chain: thought 0dc1dbe3 (analysis) established shared-origin + additive-nature + precedent (feedback_superpowers_local_overrides.md bundled-PR preference); decision_matrix quantified the tradeoff.
Alternatives Rejected
Outcome
Pending