caveman-compression-rejected-conflicts-with-law2

GitHub repo JuliusBrussee/caveman offers fragment-style output compression (drop articles, use incomplete sentences) claiming 75% token savings. Rejected: fragment-speak creates ambiguity in architectural decisions and multi-step protocols, conflicting with Law 2 (Zero Ambiguity). Our output is already optimized; their benchmarks compare against unoptimized Claude. Not a building block for this system.

Related

• caveman-compression-conflicts-with-zero-ambiguity-law
• 2026-04-04-oracle-001-self-architecture-analysis
• enterprise-capability-expansion-5-pillars-from-digital-employee-analysis
• claude-code-to-nova-20260405-163418 (archived)
• nova-critical-learnings-consolidated
• caveman-compression-creates-ambiguity-in-architectural-conte
• caveman-compression-tool-rejected-apr-2026