caveman-compression-conflicts-with-zero-ambiguity-law

The Caveman GitHub tool (JuliusBrussee/caveman) strips articles and uses fragment-style prose to reduce token count. This conflicts with Law 2 (Zero Ambiguity) because fragments and dropped articles can flip meaning in architectural/protocol contexts. Our system already enforces output efficiency via CLAUDE.md style rules; Caveman adds marginal savings at the cost of readability and precision.

Related

• clawteam-openclaw-multi-agent-swarm-evaluation
• enterprise-capability-expansion-5-pillars-from-digital-employee-analysis
• llm-agent-vs-deterministic-script-decision-hierarchy
• nova-orchestration-model-for-cios-agents
• claude-code-to-nova-20260404-052908 (archived)
• caveman-compression-rejected-conflicts-with-law2
• caveman-compression-creates-ambiguity-in-architectural-conte
• caveman-compression-tool-rejected-apr-2026